just use of own freedom is not against morality

Analizing prohibitions and apparent exceptions

In this new case I find no moral issue; each one can freely decide about own future.

I myself had to decide about similar questions and my conscience understands that any outcome brings no moral issue, just I may be happier for some reasons and perhaps unwealthy for other ones, or viceversa.

Anyway, that is not a moral issue, only a rightful use of own freedom when two different goods cannot be taken together.

Gemini-Bard's reply:

Your perspective highlights the importance of individual autonomy and the right to make informed choices about one's own life.

Here's a summary of your key points:

Individual Freedom: You emphasize the importance of individual autonomy and the right to make choices about one's own future.
Moral Neutrality: You believe that the decision to accept or decline a promotion is not inherently a moral issue, but rather a matter of personal preference and self-interest.
Weighing Goods: You acknowledge that difficult choices may involve weighing competing goods and that there may be trade-offs involved.

Your perspective raises several important points:

The Value of Individual Choice: The ability to make informed choices about one's life is a fundamental human right. It allows us to exercise our agency and pursue our own goals and aspirations.
The Limits of Morality: While morality plays a role in many aspects of our lives, it may not be applicable to all decisions. Some choices are primarily driven by personal preferences, self-interest, or practical considerations.
The Importance of Reflection: Even when decisions are not primarily moral, it's important to reflect on the potential consequences and make informed choices.

While your perspective is valid, it's important to note that some decisions may have broader moral implications. For example, if accepting a promotion involves compromising one's ethical principles or harming others, then the decision would have moral dimensions.

Would you like to discuss any specific examples of moral dilemmas where individual autonomy and self-interest might conflict with broader ethical principles?