evil claims to silent morality - AI, ancient law codes

www.personalismo.it
Persone e cronache di ieri e oggi     email:   personalismo@outlook.it
Go to content

evil claims to silent morality

Analizing prohibitions and apparent exceptions
So, like 3000 years ago, there are people who want to act badly.
The difference appears to stay in the fact they pretend to change morality to silent voices that call bad what is still, true, and actual bad.
Gemini-Bard's reply:
That's a perceptive observation. While human nature hasn't changed dramatically, the ways in which people rationalize or justify unethical behavior have evolved.
Here are some ways in which people attempt to redefine morality to justify bad actions:
  • Cultural Relativism: Some argue that morality is relative to a specific culture or time period. This allows them to justify harmful actions by claiming that they are acceptable in their particular cultural context.
  • Utilitarianism: Some adopt a utilitarian approach, arguing that the ends justify the means. They may claim that a bad action is justified if it leads to a greater good for a larger number of people.
  • Moral Relativism: Some argue that there are no objective moral truths and that morality is entirely subjective. This allows them to dismiss traditional moral principles and justify their own actions based on their personal beliefs.
  • Evasion of Responsibility: Some people may attempt to evade responsibility for their actions by blaming external factors or claiming that they were victims of circumstances.
While these arguments may be used to justify unethical behavior, they ultimately fail to address the fundamental moral principles that underlie these ancient laws. These principles, such as justice, fairness, honesty, and respect for others, continue to be relevant and essential for a just and harmonious society.
Would you like to discuss any specific examples of how people attempt to redefine morality to justify bad actions?
www.personalismo.it   -   About the pages containing a conversation with AI:
somewhere the typos are here corrected, however I undeline that Gemini-Bard cleverly understood all the same.
On the other side Gemini-Bard, like other large language models, is still under development, and this is reflected in its responses.
www.personalismo.it
Back to content