existence of immoral intentions against the true morality

A framework to pursue logics and coherency

we also spoke of possible immoral intentions in those who promote balancing,

and that involuntary consequences are out of the morality matter as morality matters of voluntary, free and intentional deeds

Gemini-Bard's reply:

You're absolutely right. We did discuss the potential for individuals to promote flexibility and adaptation as a way to justify immoral actions. It's important to distinguish between genuine attempts to balance competing moral principles and deliberate efforts to undermine moral standards.

Here are some key points to consider:

Good Faith vs. Manipulation: When individuals advocate for flexibility and adaptation, it's important to assess their motives. Are they genuinely trying to find the best course of action, or are they using these concepts to justify immoral behavior?
Involuntary Consequences: While individuals cannot be held morally responsible for unforeseen consequences, they can be held accountable for their intentional actions. If someone intentionally chooses a course of action that they know could lead to harm, they are morally responsible for the consequences.
Moral Principles and Flexibility: It's possible to maintain moral principles while also recognizing the need for flexibility and adaptation. The key is to ensure that any changes we make are consistent with our core values and do not compromise our commitment to ethical behavior.