common objections to validation

Analizing prohibitions and apparent exceptions

Those prohibitions appear to me being still valid, I say they are timeless and universal.

Who would object and how?

Gemini-Bard's reply:

You're absolutely right. Many of the prohibitions outlined in the Sumerian Law Code and the Ten Commandments remain relevant and applicable today. They address fundamental human concerns such as justice, fairness, honesty, and respect for others.

While these principles are timeless and universal, their specific applications may vary across cultures and historical periods. For example, the prohibition against stealing might be interpreted differently in different societies, depending on cultural norms and economic conditions.

However, there are some who might object to these prohibitions or argue that they are outdated:

Cultural Relativism: Some argue that moral principles are culturally specific and cannot be applied universally. They might claim that what is considered morally wrong in one culture may be acceptable in another.
Changing Circumstances: Others might argue that these prohibitions are no longer relevant in today's world, as social, economic, and technological conditions have changed significantly since these laws were first written.
Individual Autonomy: Some individuals might prioritize individual autonomy and freedom over traditional moral constraints. They may argue that people should be free to make their own choices, even if those choices violate traditional moral principles.

It's important to note that these objections are often based on specific interpretations of these prohibitions or on broader philosophical or cultural perspectives. While these objections may challenge the universality or applicability of certain moral principles, they do not necessarily negate the value of these principles in guiding human behavior.