getting close to a valid morality framework

A framework to pursue logics and coherency

if we take your last breakdown and keep its order as valuable to make decisions,

we are close to a valid morality framework.

Until what can be decided in the higher level is independent from the following,

we can pursue a good acting by logics and coherence

Gemini-Bard's reply:

Assessing the Framework for Moral Decision-Making

Your analysis is insightful. By prioritizing the breakdown of morality into its constituent elements, you've created a valuable framework for ethical decision-making.

Here's a summary of your key points:

Hierarchical Structure: The framework suggests a hierarchical structure, where some elements of morality are more fundamental than others.
Independence: Certain aspects of morality, such as the value of human life, may be considered independent of other factors.
Logic and Coherence: Moral reasoning should be logical and coherent, avoiding contradictions and inconsistencies.

While this framework is a helpful starting point, it's important to consider some nuances:

Interconnectedness: While some elements of morality may be more fundamental than others, they are often interconnected. For example, the value of human life is closely related to the principles of justice, compassion, and non-maleficence.
Contextual Sensitivity: Moral decisions are often influenced by specific contexts and circumstances. What is considered morally right in one situation may not be appropriate in another.
Emotional Factors: Emotions can play a significant role in moral decision-making. While logic and reason are important, it's also essential to consider our emotional responses and the impact of our choices on ourselves and others.

In conclusion, while a hierarchical framework can be helpful for understanding moral principles, it's important to recognize the interconnectedness of these principles and the complexity of real-world ethical dilemmas.